New Cruise Safety Measures – Too Little Too Late?

Consider the amount of very, very bad news that has occurred in the cruise industry this year, its no big surprise that the industry itself is trying to undo some of the damage.  Besides the fact that ticket prices are falling and people are beginning to question whether floating themselves over 10,000 feet of water is really that great of an idea, it just makes sense that some changes are in order to prevent further damage to the industry.

So, the cruise industry, as led by its spokes-group Cruise Line International Association and the European Cruise Council, has come together to institute some new cruise safety measures that have already been put in place, effective immediately, among its member cruise lines.

What are these new rules, and – the really big question – are they going to make a difference to cruise safety?  Well, I’ll let you judge that for yourself.

The first of the new cruise safety measures provides that additional life jackets will be

Young child wearing a lifejacket incorrectly o...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

required on each ship, so that there will be way more life jackets than could possibly be needed on each ship.  But wait!  The emergency personnel on every ship I’ve ever sailed on has always emphasized that if you aren’t in your cabin when called to your muster stations (in the event of a real emergency), not to go back to your cabin to get your life jackets, because plenty were already available.  So….what is the difference here?  Didn’t they already have more life jackets than they already needed?  I have seen large bins full of life preservers, or at least that is how they were labeled.  Maybe that’s not what they were after all?  Well, I don’t know the answer to that, but the new standard is that the life jackets available will be “far in excess” of the numbers that conceivably could be needed.  And, apropos of the picture with the young’un, it’s really important to get those life jackets on correctly!

The second of the cruise safety measures is a tightening of access to the ship’s Bridge.  This, too is a surprise to me.  Wasn’t the ship’s bridge already secure?  I know that since 9/11, I personally have not been able to get anywhere near the bridge except for one paid tour on Carnival, and on that tour, we were wanded, inspected, and not allowed to carry any cameras.  We were additionally told exactly where to stand and what we were allowed to touch (essentially, nothing).  So, what’s this all about?

Well, it appears that the real change is during restricted maneuvering, or “when increased vigilance is required.”  I suppose that makes sense, because when the ship is going through a tight spot, the captain, the other officers who have the ability to steer the ship, and the pilot, if one is aboard, should have unrestricted access to the bridge, with no distractions.  Was this a problem before?

It seems that it was.  According to a story in toledoBlade.com, Captain Schettino’s girlfriend was on the bridge during the time the Concordia was making its close-in pass. Apparently the good Captain wanted to impress on his girlfriend how daring he was and how close he could get to the island without crashing.  Oh wait….they did crash.  Seems Captain Schettino has a problem with truthfulness as well, since he asserted that no one but operational personnel was on the bridge during the sail-by.  Ah, love.  Nothing like a girlfriend aboard to get you to crash upon the rocks.

So, no more girlfriends on the bridge when things are tight.

Finally, all members of the bridge team must be pre-briefed on any passage planning before implementation, and a designated officer must be aware of and approve of the passage.

They didn’t already? This statement, taken as a reaction to the Concordia disaster, seems to intimate that no one in authority knew that the ship was going out of its way to ‘buzz’ the Island of Giglio.  But the captain knew.  Didn’t he?  Wasn’t he the one that took the ship so close in?

This is, to me a strange requirement.  The Captain, according to maritime law IS the master of the ship.  All decisions come down to him.  While every good thing that happens may not accrue to the captain, it’s a certainty that every bad thing that happens is definitely his fault. Why?  Because it’s his responsibility.  This is going to change?

I guess my best take on these three new rules is that first, why wait until the horse is out of the barn before you close the gate?  None of these rules are more important than they were before.  Secondly, one thing you never will be able to actually legislate is common sense, a commodity that is so UN-common as to be barely recognizable and even less apparent in our personal and business interactions in today’s world.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Cabins, Cruise Lines, Delays, Disasters, Introduction, Legalities, Planning, Safety | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Medical Tourism – for Good or for Bad ?

With this being an election year, and every candidate doing everything he can think of to influence voters to vote for him,  there’s a lot of talk about health insurance.  From whether you have it or not, the cost of it, the ability of insurance companies to deny you coverage, the subject runs the gamut of good and bad, and I’m sure it’ll get worse before it gets better.   The Dems want it one way, the Repubs want it another…there are some who think it should be free for everyone, and some who think no one should get it.

US Navy 040203-N-4182M-001 National Naval Medi...

Photo credit: Wikipedia

In the meantime, there are plenty of people right now who have medical needs they can’t meet.  One of the solutions some look into is visiting another country to have their health care – especially their elective care – looked into.  Medical tourism is rapidly becoming a booming industry!

BellaSugar.com, a website devoted to beauty-related topics, presents a short discussion of the various options people can choose and the industry groups that promote them.

What’s Your Take on Medical Tourism?  (bellasugar.com)

Advocates of medical tourism point out that traveling for surgery can save people thousands of dollars, that the physicians are licensed (and often trained within the United States), and that a luxury vacay can make surgery feel a little less awful. .

The problem is, of course, that medical care isn’t the same everywhere, and even physicians trained in the U.S. don’t necessarily keep up their standards when returning to their home countries.  We Americans have come to expect a certain standard of care that, while sometimes isn’t even met here, is even harder to satisfy in other countries.  And when that happens, there is often little recourse.

I had a friend who traveled to Mexico to obtain a gastric banding surgery, a surgery that has many known problems.  Things went well for her for several months, but she eventually developed complications for which she seriously needed help.  The problem was that the Mexican doctor was nowhere to be found, and American doctors didn’t want to interfere with the other doctor’s work, for fear they’d be blamed for her problems.  Amongst all this back-and-forth, my friend nearly died before she could get someone to remove the band.  The last I heard, she is on the mend now, but at some pretty significant expense, not only to herself physically, but also to her pocketbook.

This video is a special report on medical tourism that gives a good overview of the good as well as the bad aspects of this issue:

Medical Tourism | ABC News | Jeff Schult

ABC News anchor Ryan Owens interviews “Beauty from Afar” author Jeff Schult in a special report on Medical Tourism.

And finally, this video is very poorly-produced and the words are sometimes hard to understand, but it’s an excellent example of a number of the things that can go wrong if you don’t choose the right practitioner.  Of course, knowing which practitioner to choose is the $64,000 question.

WARNING MEDICAL TOURISM NIGHTMARE IN SAN JOSE COSTA RICA

Doctor Alberto Coto Calvo was the Dentist. He broke my tooth causing 3 root canals preformed while in his care, Screwed up my Bite so badly that I now suffer from severe TMJ, left me with 10 open margins ( crowns are popped off my teeth ) constant pa…

So, the takeaway from these videos is pretty obvious:  be very careful what you do when you are trying to save a little (or even a lot) of money with your healthcare.  At the very least, I’d encourage you to only use medical tourism in the most dire of circumstances, and never, ever for elective procedures.  If the procedure is elective, you should consider carefully whether taking that kind of risk is worth the perceived benefit.

Traveling is nice, but you want to be able to enjoy it, not only during your travels, but also in years to come!

 


Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in health care, Medical Tourism, Planning, Seniors, Specials, Specialty Cruises | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

OK, I’ll admit it – they had me here for just a few minutes.  I mean, really:  there has been so much bad publicity for cruise ship safety….this is really just the next step….isn’t it?

Citing Safety Concerns, Somali Pirates Refuse to Board Cruise Ships

alterx.blogspot.com4/5/12

Citing Safety Concerns, Somali Pirates Refuse to Board Cruise Ships. MOGADISHU (The Borowitz Report) April 5, 2012 – In yet another public relations setback for the beleaguered cruise industry, Somali pirates today said

Can the Concordia be saved?

Now, back to reality, considering the ample bad news of this year….this one, actually, I thought for sure was a joke, but it turns out to be true:

Dutch salvage company says it can refloat sunken Costa Concordia

digitaljournal.com3/18/12

The Dutch maritime company that is removing the oil from the sunken Italian cruise ship, the Costa Concordia, says it can refloat the huge ship and has put in a bid to do so. But the operation cannot be done cheaply.

But is cruise ship safety even possible?

This still leaves open the question of whether cruise ship safety really is a possibility in the industry as it currently exists, or not.  Can it ever be achieved, given the profile of the newest, largest ships?  Many people say no!

Are Today’s Cruise Ships Too Big to Be Safe?

cruisefever.net3/19/12

After the Costa Concordia disaster I have heard people asking about the safety of some of the larger cruise ships that exist. And while it might sound like a valid question considering some of the troubles the cruise industry has

Is cruise ship safety just a physics problem?

Now, when giving specifics, cruise ship safety really comes under the microscope when you break it down.  Here’s a discussion of the problem, as explained by my favorite cruise ship lawyer, Jim Walker of CruiseLawNews (who is, by the way, never short of an opinion):

Are Cruise Ships Dangerously Top Heavy? : Cruise Law News

www.cruiselawnews.com3/29/12

Comments (1). Ever since the Costa Concordia disaster, questions have been raised whether modern day cruise ships are being designed more dangerously by increasing their size to pile more and more passengers aboard.

And then the opposing view, which, frankly, makes no sense to me at all:

Costa Concordia disaster. Isn’t this all about physics? | David ..

davidshakespeare.com2/8/12

I do however understand basic physics. As has been explained many times in the media recently, the size of cruise ships has doubled in the last 10 years. The apparently top heavy superstructure is merely an illusion. The low

So, I am sure there is much more to be said on the topic of cruise ship safety, and many experiments and investigations yet to come.   Clearly, the cruise industry cannot change its course quickly, since plans are already on the drawing boards for many years in the future.  Nevertheless, if there is improvement to be made, what time is better than the present to get started?

Posted on by Georgene | Leave a comment